Random Films at the Cinema

I wrote a post collecting a bunch of films I’ve seen on TV, and now the counterpart – films seen in a cinema. A very mixed bunch indeed.

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri [2017]

three_billboards.jpg

The film festival darling of 2018, I had to go see it. It tells the story of Mildred (Frances McDormand), a divorced woman, who is grieving over her raped and murdered daughter. The major counterpart to her is police chief Willoughby. Mildred is angry over police inaction and rents the three titular billboards to send a message to the police chief. Willoughby is on his part trying to do the best he can, while also fighting cancer.

The film is a combination of the Coen brothers and the generic American indie film. From the Coens you get the single-mindedness and surprising moments of humor at things you shouldn’t really be laughing at. From the indies you get the human heart. The film manages to combine these sides by muting both of them down a little from their worst excesses. Copying the Coens wouldn’t be a bad thing, but toning it down allows the film to stand on its own feet. Copying the indies would obviously bad, but here the characters mostly act in a Coen film, but there are occasional moments, when the roles of the grieving mother and the police chief are dropped, and they are human.

Where this film misses is that despite the genuine tragedy, the film seems like a modern version of the pastel colored suburbs of the 50ies that are these days mostly too perfect fantasies. Here, we have a small town, where everything seems to be just so. We aren’t seeing it through nostalgia, so it’s not without problems, but there’s always checks and balances that makes everything work without too much trauma, despite some people acting quite badly under stress.

A very good film altogether.

  • Director: Martin McDonagh
  • Watched on: 7th Jul 2018
  • Watched at: Kinopalatsi 10
  • 4/5

Isle of Dogs [2018]

isle_of_dogs.jpg

I’m a fan of Wes Anderson. When he keeps his trickery to sane levels, he is absolutely wonderful. This one is a stop motion animation, telling the story of dogs being exiled to an island that used to be a weird combination of industrial area and amusement park, and now is a dump. The exile is due to dogs spreading diseases among humans. Our story begins as Atari, the son of the mayor, who orders the exile, elopes to the island in search of his beloved dog, Spots. Atari and a group of dogs embark on a grand voyage across the dump to find Spots and help the dogs in general.

As mentioned, I’m a fan of Anderson, when he keeps his trickery in check. With stop motion animation, he can throw all thoughts of that to the wind, and he does. Now, not just the delivery of the actors, but absolutely everything, is bent to his will. The result is not without charms, but the excesses eat into those quite a lot.

  • Director: Wes Anderson
  • Watched on: 11th Jul 2018
  • Watched at: Kinopalatsi 8
  • 2.5/5

The Shape of Water [2017]

the_shape_of_water

Guillermo del Toro has risen from an art house darling to a Hollywood household name. At the same time he has turned his B horror sensibilities into something secretly agreeable to even conservatives. He hasn’t discarded the horror tropes or even B film settings, but somehow turned them into a secret fantasy that we can all swoon over at the cinema, and condemn as harmless fantasy, when we get out.

And harmless this is. A story of a cleaning lady, Elisa (Sally Hawkins), who is working at a secret military testing facility, where they have sort of an alien life form in captivity. Elisa falls for the life form and it falls back and they have an impropable romantic relationship. And that’s about it. I don’t really know, what this is supposed to be.

  • Director: Guillermo del Toro
  • Watched on: 11th Jul 2018
  • Watched at: Tennispalatsi 5
  • 1.5/5

What? [1972]

what.jpg

This was my first visit to the WHS cinema in Helsinki. It has since become my favorite cinema both in programming and in that they present all the films they show. The presentation gives much depth the experience especially, since the films are otherwise quite obscure.

Like this one – everyone’s heard about Roman Polanski and most even about one of the films stars, Marcello Mastroianni. Despite the scandals of Polanski’s life finally coming to light, even our most conservative TV channels are still playing his films regularly, but not this.

The film tells of an American girl, Nancy (Sydne Rome) coming for a vacation into a hotel in an Italian coastal town. The other residents of the hotel are all sorts of weird and especially the hotel’s proprietor. About the first thing that happens to Nancy is that someone steals her pants (and later her blouse) and she doesn’t seem to have any other clothing. She engages in a weird relationship with an old pimp, Alex (Marcello Mastroianni), who wants to dress up as a tiger, when they are having sex.

The film doesn’t make much sense, but it has a weird post modern charm to it. The camera work and everything keep things interesting as well.

  • Director: Roman Polanski
  • Original Title: Che?
  • Watched on: 3rd Aug 2018
  • Watched at: WHS
  • 3/5

Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again [2018]

mamma_mia_2.jpg

Had a rare date night with my wife. I wanted to take her to the cinema Riviera Kallio and she wanted to see this, so we were set.

The film… Not much to say. It’s basically more of everything compared to the first one, but done slightly less well and with considerably less heart. There is not an interesting shot or piece of dialogue or setup in the film, but it’s good brainless fun for a date night.

  • Director: Ol Parker
  • Watched on: 13th Aug 2018
  • Watched at: Riviera
  • 2/5

Knife+Heart [2018]

knife_heart.jpg

The film is set in gay porn world of 70ies France. Anne Pareze (Vanessa Paradis) is the producer in her own company. Her ex-girlfriend edits the company’s films – Anne isn’t over it and is (rather badly) attempting win her back over all the time. Her actors are her friends, but there’s a serious issue – a serial killer is picking off Anne’s actors.

The setup is very deeply grounded in the more innocent porn of the 70ies and also in B films. The aesthetic is copied from both, but instead of going for the gags common in porn that time, the film asks us to take the B film tropes seriously. There’s a bird expert with a claw for a hand, and the serial killer has a blade snapping out of his dildo.

This sounds like a premise for failure, but it is not. The aesthetic is spot on, the dread from the killer is real, the slightly over the top gay porn actors are a nice counter-balance. It just works. There’s just a hint of extra fat that could’ve been left on the editing room floor to fix the couple of spots, where the film gives too much slack, but otherwise a great genre exercise.

  • Director: Yann Gonzalez
  • Original Title: Un couteau dans le coeur
  • Watched on: 1st Feb 2019
  • Watched at: WHS
  • 4.5/5

The Favourite [2018]

the_favourite.jpg

Yorgos Lanthimos is another auteur in the style of Wes Anderson – someone with an immediately recognizable style, and who can be a bit too gimmicky given enough freedom. I enjoyed his two previous efforts though, so off I went.

Here the setting is the court of Queen Anne (Olivia Colman). Her favorite adviser and lover, Lady Sarah, the Duchess of Marlborough (Rachel Weisz), has been running the state in practice. This has pissed of the Queen, since her favorite lover is absent quite a bit and enjoying herself too much. Enter Abigail, Baroness Masham (Emma Stone), a down on her luck noble, who manages to get a job from her cousin, Lady Sarah, and quickly finds her way into the Queen’s favor and bed.

Unlike his previous films, this one doesn’t tackle any major social issues, except perhaps to show in some honesty the reality of our past. This gives him too much freedom and the film is set for failure with Lanthimos’ signature slightly too frank dialogue and macabre scenes given free reign.

But the film doesn’t fail. That is purely thanks to the formidable trio of ladies in the leading roles. They make you buy the whole thing hook, line and sinker. The combination turned out to be a magnificent film.

  • Director: Yorgos Lanthimos
  • Watched on: 20th Mar 2019
  • Watched at: Tennispalatsi 5
  • 4.5/5

La La Land [2016]

la_la_land

I had a date night with T and we went to see a film. This and Rogue One: A Star Wars Story [2016] were on the table and we chose this based on it being a rare musical (musicals being the secret pleasure of T) that interested me too. I was interested for the noise it was generating in the press and also for having seen Whiplash [2014] by Chazelle earlier.

Whiplash was a problematic film. On the one hand it is an extremely good film with a tight beyond measure structure and intensity. On the other hand it tells us that it is completely okay and sometimes even necessary to be an absolute asshole, and in the highest levels of competition, if you fail by just a hair, you are nothing. Obviously this is true on those levels, but still not a message I like seeing repeated.

After that I’m sure I’m not the only one surprised that Chazelle has managed an absolutely human story of love, dreams and their conflict. Where to begin…

Pretty much everything in this film is loaned from somewhere else, but the loaned pieces are chosen with taste. Also, everything has been at least slightly tuned for the film and the changes are improvements in the context of the film. This stealing extends through everything. Shots, angles, scenes, dance pieces, songs, plot twists, dialogue, clothing, settings… All of it is composed into a seamless film that manages to be something original and most of the times, if you catch the reference, it adds to the depth of the scene. That is, stealing is okay, if you steal from the best and know what you are doing.

In addition to the stolen bits, the film has its share of name dropping for film (and jazz too, but I’m not too familiar with that scene) aficionados. The whole referential layer is big enough to be appreciated on its own.

Then you have the camera work. This is just the opening scene – it’s not the first time single shot techniques have been used to capture complex choreographed scenes, but this is the first time it’s been done like this. The camera moves effortlessly among the cars and dancers hugging them closely, it twists on a dime to frame the next dancer chosen to be in the spotlight, it takes you inside the dance and moves around with ease that was surprising and effective.

That was just one case of inspired use of the camera in the film. Throughout the film, everything done with the camera supports the story. Sometimes it picks a framing to refer a similar framing in another film to add depth to this one. At other times the camera picks angles or uses frames within the frame to enhance emotions. Mostly this is basic stuff, but it is done very well and consistently here.

Although the script is nothing special, it is still very solid. Characters have motivations and the story has a flow and a rhythm. The camerawork, the references, all of that add depth to what is in the script. This is in essence yet another love story. Those tend to rise or fall based on the charisma of and chemistry between the leads. Here I bought into everything that Sebastian (played by Ryan Gosling) and Mia (played by Emma Stone) went through together.

The story is about two aspiring artists. Mia works in a studio back lot cafe and dreams of acting herself, while Sebastian hopes to buy a piece of real estate that used to hold the most legendary jazz club in LA to revive the jazz club. They have a few chance meetings and end up being together, while chasing their dreams. One of them sells out to be successful, while the other keeps struggling. There’s bitterness over selling out and some misunderstandings and all the usual things. Then there’s an opportunity for the other that will separate them for a long time. Obviously the opportunity is taken and the parting is bittersweet, but that is just warming up for the finale. The final act is stolen straight out of The Umbrellas of Cherbourg [1964] – it is one of the most devastating film endings I’ve seen and I haven’t seen it copied elsewhere, so this is yet another stolen scene picked with taste and used to great effect in this context.

Besides being structurally and technically very very sound and interesting, the script gives the love story the framing it needs and Gosling and Stone take it the rest of the way. I was just blown away on so many levels. This is one of the rare cases, when a film is worthy of the Oscars it will be receiving in just a few weeks.

The grade is intentionally above the supposed maximum. It is reserved for films that have no flaws and are more than the sum of their parts. That is, for masterpieces, where everything adds up to more than it should. This is one of those.

  • Director: Damien Chazelle
  • Watched on: 21st Jan 2017
  • Watched at: Kinopalatsi
  • 6/5